Find a Trusts, Foundations & Family Office Lawyer

A foundation is a separate legal person with no shareholders or members, created to hold and manage assets according to its charter and by-laws, and governed by a council rather than a board. DIFC and ADGM each run their own foundations regime, and although the underlying concept is the same, the two are separate legal frameworks with their own registrar, own charter requirements and own ongoing filing obligations — a DIFC Foundation is not automatically recognised or interchangeable with an ADGM Foundation.

The choice between them usually turns on where the family's other structures, bank accounts or advisers already sit, rather than on a meaningful legal difference in what a foundation can do. A lawyer who works across both centres can advise on which registrar's requirements fit the family's practical circumstances rather than defaulting to whichever one a consultancy happens to sell.

Both DIFC and ADGM allow trusts governed by their own trust law, built on English common-law trust principles rather than UAE civil law, which is precisely why they are used by families who want a familiar, internationally recognisable trust structure inside the UAE. A trustee holds legal title to trust assets for the benefit of named or classed beneficiaries, subject to duties set out in the trust instrument and the applicable trust law.

As with foundations, a DIFC trust and an ADGM trust are governed by different, though similarly structured, legal regimes. Mainland UAE and Abu Dhabi mainland do not have an equivalent civil-law trust concept, which is one of the main reasons families use DIFC or ADGM at all rather than structuring directly onshore.

A purpose trust holds assets for a stated purpose rather than for named beneficiaries — useful for holding shares in an operating business, supporting a philanthropic goal, or underpinning a private trust company structure without creating a beneficial-ownership chain that a conventional trust would require. DIFC and ADGM both permit purpose trusts, subject to having an enforcer who can hold the trustee to account in place of a beneficiary.

Families sometimes use a purpose trust specifically to own the shares of a private trust company, so that the family's wealth structure is not itself beneficially owned by any single family member — a lawyer can explain whether that layer is actually needed for a given family's objectives or whether it adds cost without adding protection.

A private trust company is a company set up for the sole purpose of acting as trustee to one family's trusts, rather than using a commercial trustee. It gives the family more direct involvement in trustee decisions through a board that can include family members and trusted advisers, while keeping the formal fiduciary structure a trust requires.

ADGM's Restricted Scope Company vehicle is commonly used as the PTC itself, and DIFC has its own equivalent routes. Either way, a PTC is still a company with real filing, governance and licensing obligations — it is not a shortcut around regulation, and a lawyer should confirm what ongoing compliance the structure actually carries before a family commits to it.

RAK International Corporate Centre offers its own foundations regime and is a genuinely used structure among UAE-based families, but it sits in Ras Al Khaimah, outside the four markets — Dubai mainland, DIFC, Abu Dhabi mainland and ADGM — this page otherwise covers. Families sometimes hold a RAK ICC foundation alongside DIFC or ADGM entities, or choose it instead for cost or simplicity reasons.

Because RAK ICC operates under its own separate regulations, a structure built there does not automatically carry over the case law, court oversight or professional-trustee ecosystem that DIFC and ADGM have built up. Ask any lawyer advising on a RAK ICC foundation to explain plainly how dispute resolution and enforcement actually work for that vehicle, since it differs from the DIFC and ADGM court-backed model.

Federal Decree-Law No. 37 of 2022 gives UAE family businesses a dedicated legal framework for governance and succession — family charters under Article 6, share-disposal and pre-emption arrangements under Article 8, including a first-refusal right for family members, a waiver route to a spouse or first-degree relative, and a 75% partner approval requirement where a non-family buyer is involved. The purpose is to keep a business intact across a generational handover rather than fragmenting on a founder's death or retirement.

Its scope is commonly understated as mainland-only. Article 3(3) extends the Law to family businesses established in free zones, to the extent it does not conflict with that free zone's own laws and regulations. The genuine exclusion is by company type: Article 3(2) puts joint stock companies and partnership companies outside it. So the question for a given family business is what form it takes, not simply where it is registered.

This sits alongside, not instead of, DIFC or ADGM structuring — many families use a mainland operating company governed under the Family Business Law framework, with the shares in that company then held through a DIFC or ADGM foundation or trust for succession and asset-protection purposes.

DIFC has its own registration pathway and rulebook for family offices, allowing a single family — or, under the multi-family variant, several unrelated families — to operate an in-house structure managing investments, philanthropy and administration, rather than using an external wealth manager. Registration brings the office inside DIFC's regulatory perimeter and its own set of ongoing obligations.

Exactly which activities trigger the need for DIFC registration, and what asset or activity threshold applies, is not a fixed figure worth quoting here — DIFC's own current rulebook is the source, and a lawyer should confirm the up-to-date position against it rather than a number repeated in marketing content, since these figures are revised.

ADGM runs a parallel but separately governed family office framework through the Financial Services Regulatory Authority, with its own registration route, its own permitted activities and its own ongoing compliance calendar. As with DIFC, the exact scope and any applicable thresholds should be checked against ADGM's current rules directly rather than relied on from a secondhand figure.

Families choosing between DIFC and ADGM for a family office usually weigh the same practical factors as with foundations and trusts — where the rest of the family's banking, investment and advisory relationships already sit — more than any single legal distinction between the two regimes.

A foundation is its own legal person and can hold assets directly in its own name, which some families find conceptually simpler and which avoids some of the beneficial-ownership layering a trust involves. A trust, by contrast, relies on the trustee-beneficiary relationship and has a much longer, more internationally tested body of case law behind it, particularly in common-law jurisdictions where the family may also hold assets.

Neither is inherently better — the right choice depends on where the family's other assets and banking relationships sit, what a bank or counterparty in another jurisdiction will recognise, and how much direct family involvement in governance the family actually wants. This is a structuring decision worth taking to a lawyer rather than defaulting to whichever vehicle a consultancy is set up to sell.

UAE-resident trusts, foundations, private trust companies and family offices can still fall within the Common Reporting Standard and, for US-connected families, FATCA, depending on how the structure is classified and where its controlling persons and beneficiaries are tax-resident. Moving a structure into DIFC or ADGM does not, by itself, remove these reporting obligations.

Getting the entity classification wrong at the outset — for example treating a structure as reporting when it should be classified differently, or the reverse — creates a compliance problem that surfaces later, often when a bank asks for self-certification documentation the family did not expect. A lawyer working alongside the family's accountants should confirm classification at formation, not after a bank query arrives.

Foundations and trusts in DIFC and ADGM are commonly used to hold shares in UAE onshore or free-zone operating companies, and in some cases to hold UAE real estate directly or through an intermediate holding company. Each asset type carries its own registration and transfer mechanics with the relevant land department or companies registry, and those don't disappear just because the ultimate owner is now a trust or foundation rather than an individual.

A lawyer should map out, before formation, exactly how each asset the family wants inside the structure will actually be transferred in and what registration steps that requires — this is where generic template structuring most often runs into real-world friction.

A foundation is run by a council, a trust by a trustee, and either can have a protector — sometimes called a guardian — whose consent is required for certain major decisions, a check on the trustee or council rather than a replacement for it. Getting these roles' powers and duties clearly drafted in the charter or trust instrument matters more than which titles are used.

Family members are often included as council members or protectors precisely so the family retains real influence over major decisions, but doing so without clear drafting can blur the line between legitimate oversight and the family effectively still controlling the assets personally — which can undermine the very asset-protection and succession purpose of the structure. This is a drafting point worth getting right with a lawyer rather than a template.

A letter of wishes lets a settlor or founder record guidance for trustees or a council on how they'd like discretion exercised, without making that guidance legally binding the way the trust instrument or charter itself is. It's a flexible tool for multi-generational planning, since it can be updated without amending the formal governing document.

Beneficiary classes — naming a defined group, such as 'the settlor's children and their descendants', rather than fixed individuals — are common in UAE-based structures precisely because they accommodate a family that will grow and change over decades. A lawyer can advise on how broadly or narrowly to draft a class for a given family's intentions.

A family constitution, sometimes called a family charter, sets out a family's shared values, decision-making processes, and rules for family members' involvement in the business or wealth structure — distinct from, but often referenced by, the legal documents themselves. It's not usually a legally binding contract in the way a trust deed is, but families increasingly formalise parts of it, particularly share-transfer and exit provisions, within the legal structure itself.

Where a family constitution and a trust or foundation's governing document say different things, the formal legal document generally controls — a lawyer should check the two are consistent rather than assuming a well-meaning family charter will be enforceable on its own.

Families who already have a trust or foundation established in another jurisdiction can sometimes continue or redomicile that structure into DIFC or ADGM rather than winding it up and starting again, depending on both the origin jurisdiction's rules and DIFC's or ADGM's own continuation provisions.

This is a genuinely technical piece of cross-border work, since it requires the origin jurisdiction to permit an outward continuation and DIFC or ADGM to accept an inward one, with the trust or foundation's assets and existing obligations carrying across intact. It is not something to attempt without a lawyer who has actually handled a continuation, not just a fresh formation.

Trusts and foundations aren't necessarily permanent — they can be varied, wound up, or in contested cases, brought before the DIFC Courts or ADGM Courts for directions or to resolve a dispute among beneficiaries, council members or trustees. Both courts have real, tested experience with trust and foundation matters, which is part of why families use these regimes rather than structuring entirely offshore with no accessible court.

A dispute over a trust or foundation — a beneficiary challenging a trustee's discretion, or a family disagreement over a council decision — is a different kind of matter from setting one up, and calls for a lawyer experienced in DIFC or ADGM contentious trusts work specifically, not just formation.