PRACTICE AREA

Find a Construction Disputes & Claims Lawyer

For drafting or reviewing contracts, subcontracts and project documentation before a claim arises, construction contracts lawyers are the better fit.

Construction disputes in the UAE sit on a legal base that has already changed. Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 promulgating the Civil Transactions Law entered into force on 1 June 2026 under its Article 3, so much of the commentary still circulating describes a framework that has been superseded. This page covers what happens once a project has gone wrong and a claim is live. LEXNOVA is not a law firm. It gives no legal advice and takes no view on the merits of any claim; it is a lawyer-matching service, every match is reviewed by a person, and the relationship runs directly between you and the lawyer you choose.

LAST REVIEWED 22 SEPTEMBER 2026

Example Construction Disputes & Claims Matters

  • Pursuing or defending an extension-of-time and prolongation claim on a Dubai mainland project
  • A defect claim brought against a contractor or engineer within the decennial liability period
  • Recovering unpaid interim certificates where the employer has stopped certifying work
  • A DIAC arbitration arising out of a FIDIC-based contract with a disputed final account
  • Testing whether a claim belongs onshore, in DIAC arbitration, or before the DIFC or ADGM Courts
  • Contested termination, demobilisation from site, and the claims that follow in both directions
  • A subcontractor payment or defects claim running in parallel with the main contract dispute

WHO MAY NEED THIS

This category is for employers, developers, main contractors, subcontractors, consultants and engineers with a live or imminent construction claim in the UAE, and for the insurers and funders standing behind one. It covers the contractor sitting on an unpaid certificate, the developer facing a defect claim years after handover, and the counterparty who has just discovered that its arbitration clause names an institution that no longer exists.

What sits in this category, and how it differs from the construction contracts category

LEXNOVA already publishes a construction contracts category covering the agreements and project documentation behind a project — main contracts, FIDIC-based forms and their amendments, subcontracts and consultant appointments. This page is the disputes-and-claims specialism beside it, and it starts where that one stops: once a notice has been served, a certificate has gone unpaid, a defect has appeared, or termination is on the table.

The distinction is not cosmetic. Transactional construction lawyers and construction disputes lawyers are frequently different people with different careers, and the skills that produce a well-drafted contract are not those that win an argument about the programme three years later. If you are already in a dispute, the useful match is a lawyer who spends their time in tribunals and expert meetings.

The governing statute has changed, and it is already in force

Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 promulgating the Civil Transactions Law was issued on 1 October 2025 and published in Official Gazette No. 809 on 14 October 2025. Article 3 set its entry into force at 1 June 2026, so it is in force now. A surprising amount of published UAE construction material still describes it as a forthcoming reform.

Practically, the provisions that decide onshore construction claims now come from the new instrument. Where a dispute straddles the commencement date, which text governs which part of it is a real question — and although the new law expressly repeals Federal Law No. 5 of 1985 (Article 2 of the promulgating decree-law), it states that it does not apply retroactively to earlier facts and acts unless it provides otherwise. That is a point for a lawyer with the gazetted Arabic, not an assumption.

Decennial liability: the ten-year exposure that cannot be contracted away

Decennial liability is the defining long-tail risk in UAE construction. It imposes strict liability on the contractor and on the engineer or architect, for ten years, for total or partial collapse of a building or fixed installation and for defects threatening its stability and safety. A separate three-year limitation period runs from discovery, and both have to be diarised from the correct date.

The rule that gives it teeth is the anti-exclusion rule: an agreement purporting to exclude or limit the decennial liability of the contractor or the engineer is void, and that is understood to be preserved in the new Code. A liability cap negotiated hard at contract stage can therefore be worth nothing against the claim that actually arrives.

The article numbers this page will not publish, and the subcontractor point that is not settled

Law-firm commentary places decennial liability at specific articles of the new Code and notes that the previous law’s corresponding articles have been renumbered. That numbering was not confirmed against the gazetted primary text, so it is not published here. An unconfirmed article number in a defect claim is a liability rather than a convenience.

The same caution applies to a reported change with real consequences. Two independent sources report that the new Code expressly excludes the main contractor–subcontractor relationship from decennial liability, which would alter how defect risk passes down a contracting chain. Only one gives article numbers and the primary text was not confirmed, so the position is reported, not established, and should not be planned around in either direction.

The forum map: onshore courts, DIAC, DIFC and ADGM

A UAE construction dispute generally lands in one of three places. The onshore civil courts of the relevant emirate, applying the Civil Transactions Law under Arabic-language procedure and leaning heavily on court-appointed experts. Arbitration, most commonly administered by DIAC. Or the DIFC Courts or ADGM Courts, each a separate common-law jurisdiction with its own judiciary.

Which forum applies is decided by the contract, the location of the project and the identity of the parties, not by preference — and getting it wrong is hard to unwind. The forum question should be settled as a discrete first exercise, because the shape of the claim, the evidence it needs and the timetable it runs to all differ by forum.

What Dubai Decree No. 34 of 2021 did to arbitration clauses

Decree No. 34 of 2021 concerning the Dubai International Arbitration Centre was issued on 14 September 2021 and came into force on publication under Article 10. Article 1 constitutes DIAC as a non-governmental, non-profit centre with legal personality and financial and administrative autonomy; Article 2 gives it a head office in Dubai with a mandatory DIFC branch; Article 4 abolished the Emirates Maritime Arbitration Centre and the DIFC Arbitration Institute and DIFC-LCIA.

Article 6(a) keeps agreements naming the abolished centres valid, substituting DIAC, unless the parties agree otherwise; Article 6(b) lets tribunals already constituted continue under their adopted rules. Article 4(b) supplies the default that catches people out — absent agreement on a seat, the seat is the DIFC. Above it sits the federal arbitration statute, Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 as amended by Federal Decree-Law No. 15 of 2023, issued 4 September 2023.

There is no UAE construction tribunal — and what the Dubai Special Tribunal actually is

There is no specialist construction tribunal in the UAE: no standing construction court, no statutory construction adjudicator, no dedicated technology-and-construction division at federal level. The body most often cited as if it were one is the Dubai Special Tribunal for Unfinished and Cancelled Real Property Projects, established by Decree No. 33 of 2020, issued on 24 November 2020.

Article 6 gives that Tribunal jurisdiction over claims whose subject matter or cause is an unfinished or cancelled real property project, together with liquidation and investor and purchaser rights. It is a distressed-development jurisdiction rather than a construction-contract one, and does not hear general contractor claims. Article 4 of the same Decree excludes projects located inside the DIFC.

No statutory adjudication, no security of payment — the contract carries all of it

Contractors arriving from the United Kingdom, Australia, Singapore or Malaysia routinely expect a statutory payment regime: a right to refer disputes to fast adjudication, mandatory payment notices, statutory suspension for non-payment. Nothing equivalent was located in UAE law. There is no statutory security-of-payment or adjudication regime here.

Everything therefore depends on the contract. Whether a dispute board exists, whether its decisions bind, what a payment notice must say and by when, whether suspension is permitted — all contractual, and all capable of being amended away. Standard-form protections a contractor assumes are guaranteed by law are here guaranteed only by the drafting in front of them.

START YOUR REQUEST

Tell Us About Your Matter.

The matter type is already set to Construction Disputes & Claims, so the form begins with your location. LEXNOVA is a lawyer-matching service, not a law firm — any legal advice comes directly from the independent legal professional you are connected with.

Step 2 of 540%

Where is your matter located?

HOW LEXNOVA LEGAL CONNECT WORKS

Tell us what you need, we review your requirements against practice area, location, and language, and — where appropriate — help facilitate an introduction to a potentially suitable legal professional. The legal advice itself is always provided directly by that professional.

See the full process

FAQ

Overview & Eligibility

Anything arising out of the performance of a construction contract rather than its formation — delay and extension of time, disputed variations, unpaid certificates, final-account disagreements, defect claims, suspension and termination, and claims against consultants or engineers. Formation-stage work sits in the construction contracts category.

Construction disputes lawyers handle claims at every level of a project’s contractual chain, including a subcontractor’s payment or defects claim running in parallel with the main contract dispute. The subcontract is read on its own terms, because its payment, notice and dispute provisions may not mirror the main contract.

Construction projects run on layered contracts — owner to contractor, contractor to subcontractors, with consultants alongside — so one problem can produce claims in several directions at once. A lawyer experienced in multi-party construction disputes can help you understand your position relative to each party involved.

Yes. Article 3 of Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 set entry into force at 1 June 2026, so it applies now rather than forthcoming. Any briefing describing it as an upcoming change is stale, and advice built on the previous Civil Code should be re-checked.

Yes. Article 2 of Federal Decree-Law No. 25 of 2025 provides that Federal Law No. 5 of 1985 promulgating the Civil Transactions Law, as amended, is repealed, and the new law has been in force since 1 June 2026. How it applies to facts and contracts from before that date is a question for a lawyer: the new law says it does not apply retroactively unless it provides otherwise.

It is the strict ten-year liability UAE law places on the contractor and on the engineer or architect for total or partial collapse of a building or fixed installation, and for defects threatening its stability and safety. It arises by operation of law rather than through the contract.

The long-standing rule in UAE law is that any agreement purporting to exclude or limit the contractor’s or the engineer’s decennial liability is void, and that rule is understood to be preserved in the new Code. A liability cap or consequential-loss exclusion will not do that work.

This page deliberately does not publish them. Law-firm commentary places the provisions and gives numbers, but that numbering was not confirmed against the gazetted primary text, and an unconfirmed citation in a defect claim is worse than none. Ask your lawyer to cite from the gazette.

Three broad routes: the onshore civil courts of the relevant emirate under Arabic-language civil procedure; arbitration, most commonly at DIAC; or the DIFC Courts or ADGM Courts where the contract or the parties place the dispute inside one of those common-law jurisdictions.

There is no UAE construction tribunal — no dedicated construction court and no standing construction adjudication body at federal level. Ordinary construction claims go where ordinary contract claims go, to the courts or to arbitration under the contract.

The Dubai Special Tribunal for Unfinished and Cancelled Real Property Projects was established by Decree No. 33 of 2020, issued 24 November 2020. Article 6 gives it jurisdiction over claims whose subject matter or cause is an unfinished or cancelled real property project, plus liquidation and investor and purchaser rights. It does not hear general construction-contract or contractor claims.

No. Article 4 of Decree No. 33 of 2020 excludes projects located inside the DIFC. So even within its own subject matter the Tribunal has a geographic limit, and where a project actually sits has to be established before anything is filed.

Your rights come from the contract, not a statute, so the first step is establishing what the payment, certification, notice and suspension provisions say and whether their preconditions have been met. A lawyer should check the notice trail before any step that could itself be a breach.

An employer’s claim rests on the contract: the delay or liquidated-damages clause, any notice, certification or programme preconditions it sets, and its own mechanism for any deduction or set-off. A contractor defending it, or claiming extension of time and prolongation costs, needs the contract’s notices served within its time bars; there is no statutory adjudication to fall back on. Whether a court can adjust an agreed delay-damages figure now falls under the Civil Transactions Law in force since 1 June 2026 — the old Civil Code rule many guides still quote was repealed — so have a lawyer confirm the current test, and which law governs a contract signed earlier. The contract usually picks the forum: onshore courts, which lean on court-appointed experts, DIAC arbitration, or the DIFC or ADGM Courts. Off-plan buyers should see LEXNOVA’s page ‘The Developer Is Two Years Late Handing Over My Apartment’. A construction lawyer can check your notice trail before you claim or deduct.

Take advice promptly rather than responding before you understand your position. The contract’s defects provisions, the handover records and the notice trail are the usual starting point, and a lawyer can tell you what response the claim calls for.

Yes. Where the parties disagree over whether a change in scope was instructed, and what it is worth, the contract’s variation procedure and the instructions actually given on the project are the usual starting point, and a lawyer can help clarify your contractual position.

Yes. Many construction disputes lawyers have specific experience with FIDIC and the other standard form contracts common in the region, and with the amendments parties make to them.

Dubai Decree No. 34 of 2021 concerning the Dubai International Arbitration Centre, issued 14 September 2021 and in force on publication under its Article 10, abolished the DIFC Arbitration Institute and DIFC-LCIA at Article 4. Contracts still naming them are common, and the Decree now governs what happens to them.

Article 6(a) of Decree No. 34 of 2021 keeps existing agreements naming the abolished centres valid, with DIAC substituted, unless the parties agree otherwise; Article 6(b) lets tribunals already constituted continue under their adopted rules. The clause is not dead, but it no longer means what it says.

The same Article 4 of Decree No. 34 of 2021 abolished the Emirates Maritime Arbitration Centre. Construction contracts on marine, port and coastal works sometimes carry EMAC clauses, and those fall under the same Article 6 substitution and transition provisions.

Under Article 4(b) of Decree No. 34 of 2021, where the parties have not agreed a seat the DIFC is the default seat. That places the arbitration under DIFC curial supervision rather than onshore supervision, which changes the consequences for challenge and enforcement.

DIAC is the Dubai International Arbitration Centre. Article 1 of Decree No. 34 of 2021 constitutes it as a non-governmental, non-profit centre with its own legal personality and financial and administrative autonomy, and Article 2 gives it a head office in Dubai with a mandatory DIFC branch.

The federal arbitration statute is Federal Law No. 6 of 2018, as amended by Federal Decree-Law No. 15 of 2023, issued 4 September 2023. It sits above the institutional rules, which govern only the procedure the parties chose.

They can, where the contract, the parties or the project bring the dispute within their jurisdiction. Both are separate common-law jurisdictions with English-language procedure and their own judges, and whether a dispute belongs there is a threshold question decided on the contract and the facts.

Not necessarily a different lawyer, but one with genuine, specific experience of the forum your dispute sits in. The DIFC Courts are a common-law, English-language jurisdiction, separate from the onshore courts’ Arabic-language civil-law system, so their procedures differ.

The contract as executed with every amendment, the notice trail, certified and uncertified payment applications, programmes and progress records, site instructions and variation orders, and the handover and defect documentation. Onshore proceedings commonly run through a court-appointed expert, so reconstructable records outweigh argument.

Sometimes. Delay, defect and cost claims often benefit from technical expert input from engineers or quantity surveyors, and a lawyer experienced in construction disputes will typically know when expert evidence would genuinely strengthen your position.

Yes. For a significant claim it is reasonable to compare how different lawyers read the position, the approach they propose and their fees before engaging one.

No. LEXNOVA Legal Connect is a lawyer-matching service, not a law firm. It does not advise on claims, draft notices, appear in arbitration or represent anyone in court. It reviews every enquiry with a person and connects you to an independent lawyer, and from there the engagement is entirely between you and that lawyer.

No. LEXNOVA does not guarantee outcomes, and no responsible lawyer would either.

Fees & Timelines

The framework is a ten-year liability period, with a separate limitation period of three years running from discovery of the collapse or defect within which a claim must be brought. The two periods do different jobs and both should be diarised against the handover record.

No. Nothing equivalent to the United Kingdom or Australian construction payment legislation was located — no statutory short-form adjudication, no statutory payment notice regime, no statutory suspension right for non-payment. Payment protection here is entirely contractual.

It varies considerably with the complexity of the matter and the dispute resolution route the contract specifies, from a few months for simpler matters to much longer for complex, multi-party disputes. Not every dispute ends in litigation or arbitration: many resolve through negotiation or the contract’s own dispute resolution procedures.

LEXNOVA is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice, legal opinions, legal representation, or legal services. Any legal advice or representation is provided directly by the independent legal professional engaged by the client.

A connection or introduction does not constitute a guarantee, endorsement, or assurance of outcome. Users should independently confirm the professional's qualifications, authorization, fees, scope of engagement, and suitability.