PRACTICE AREA

Find a Restructuring & Insolvency Lawyer

Restructuring and insolvency in the UAE operates across several separate regimes rather than one unified bankruptcy system. Onshore, Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 provided for a dedicated Bankruptcy Court, which a Federal Judiciary Council decision in July 2025 seated at the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance — a federal court, not the Abu Dhabi emirate-level court of similar name, and a detail commonly misreported as a Dubai institution. The DIFC and ADGM each run their own separate insolvency frameworks, and the tools available differ substantially between them: ADGM alone offers a Deed of Company Arrangement with cross-class cram-down, while onshore UAE law does not recognise a scheme of arrangement or a floating charge in the way some other jurisdictions do. Getting the regime and the available tools right, before choosing a strategy, materially changes what a distressed business or its creditors can achieve. LEXNOVA is not a law firm. We help you describe a restructuring or insolvency matter and explore potentially suitable lawyers with genuine, current experience in the relevant UAE regime.

LAST REVIEWED 21 SEPTEMBER 2026

Example Restructuring & Insolvency Matters

  • Advising a distressed company on onshore preventive composition or restructuring options
  • Filing or defending a bankruptcy petition before the Abu Dhabi-seated federal Bankruptcy Court
  • Structuring an ADGM Deed of Company Arrangement, including cross-class cram-down
  • Navigating a DIFC insolvency filing for a DIFC-registered entity
  • Advising secured and unsecured creditors on recovery options during a distressed situation
  • Handling director duties and personal exposure questions in a company facing insolvency

WHO MAY NEED THIS

Distressed businesses and their directors, secured and unsecured creditors, and any mainland UAE, DIFC or ADGM entity considering restructuring options, bankruptcy protection, liquidation, or a distressed asset sale.

Understanding Restructuring and Insolvency in the UAE

Restructuring and insolvency work addresses what happens when a company cannot meet its obligations as they fall due, ranging from a negotiated reorganisation to a formal liquidation.

The UAE does not operate a single bankruptcy system. Onshore UAE, the DIFC and ADGM each run their own regime, with different courts, different procedures and, in places, genuinely different tools.

Why the UAE Runs More Than One Insolvency Regime

The DIFC and ADGM are financial free zones with their own courts and their own insolvency laws, operating independently of the onshore federal framework that applies elsewhere in the UAE.

This means the regime that applies to a distressed company depends on where it is registered, not simply on where it does business or where its assets happen to sit.

The Abu Dhabi-Seated Bankruptcy Court: Correcting Two Common Misconceptions

Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 provided at Article 5 for one or more courts or divisions to be designated as the Bankruptcy Court for onshore UAE bankruptcy matters. The law did not itself constitute that court; a Federal Judiciary Council decision issued in July 2025 did, seating it at the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance.

Two things are frequently got wrong. The first is that it is assumed to be a Dubai institution. The second is subtler and matters just as much: the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance are part of the federal judiciary, not the Abu Dhabi emirate-level judiciary that shares a similar name. The Federal Judiciary Council may also establish branches in other emirates with the same jurisdiction, so for any onshore filing or defence the current seat is worth confirming rather than assumed from an older source.

Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 and the Onshore Framework

This law restated and updated the onshore UAE bankruptcy framework, in force 1 May 2024, covering preventive composition, restructuring and liquidation procedures for onshore companies. Article 3(2) carves out free zone entities that have their own insolvency regimes, which is why DIFC and ADGM companies fall outside it.

A lawyer with current experience of this framework can advise on which procedure realistically fits a company’s specific financial position.

What Onshore UAE Law Does Not Recognise

Onshore UAE law does not recognise a scheme of arrangement in the way some other jurisdictions do, and it does not recognise a floating charge.

This has real practical consequences: security generally needs to be taken over specific, identified assets, and certain restructuring techniques familiar from other systems simply are not available onshore. A lawyer can advise on what actually is available instead.

ADGM’s Deed of Company Arrangement and Cross-Class Cram-Down

ADGM alone, among the UAE’s insolvency regimes, offers a Deed of Company Arrangement, a tool that lets a company reach a binding arrangement with its creditors.

ADGM’s regime also provides for cross-class cram-down, allowing a restructuring to bind a dissenting class of creditors in appropriate circumstances. Neither tool is available onshore or under the DIFC’s regime.

DIFC’s Separate Insolvency Regime

The DIFC runs its own insolvency framework, distinct from both the onshore federal law and ADGM’s regime, applicable to entities registered within the DIFC.

A DIFC entity in distress needs advice grounded specifically in DIFC insolvency law, not an assumption that onshore or ADGM rules carry across.

Choosing the Right Regime for a Multi-Jurisdiction Group

A group with entities spanning mainland UAE, the DIFC and ADGM can find itself navigating three independently operating insolvency regimes at once, each with its own court and its own tools.

Coordinating strategy across all three, rather than assuming one regime’s approach applies group-wide, is often the difference between an orderly restructuring and a fragmented one.

Restructuring Options for a Distressed Onshore Company

Onshore UAE law provides preventive composition and restructuring procedures intended to give a distressed but fundamentally viable company a path to reorganise short of liquidation.

Which option fits depends heavily on the company’s specific financial position and the willingness of its creditors, a lawyer can advise on the realistic path forward.

Liquidation: How the Process Generally Works

Liquidation generally involves realising a company’s assets and distributing the proceeds to creditors according to their priority, under court or appointed-liquidator oversight, before the company is dissolved.

The specific process and timeline depend on the regime involved, onshore, DIFC or ADGM, and on whether the liquidation is voluntary or ordered by the court.

Secured vs Unsecured Creditors

Secured creditors generally have rights specifically tied to the assets covered by their security, while unsecured creditors rank behind them for those particular assets.

Given that onshore UAE law does not recognise a floating charge, how security was actually taken matters a great deal to how a creditor’s position plays out in a distress scenario.

Director Duties and Personal Exposure in Financial Distress

Directors of a company approaching insolvency can face personal exposure depending on their conduct, particularly around continuing to trade or take on credit once financial difficulty is apparent.

Directors facing this situation benefit from independent legal advice on their own position, separate from advice given to the company itself.

Cross-Border Recognition and Foreign Creditors

A UAE entity with foreign creditors or assets abroad, or a foreign entity with UAE assets, raises cross-border recognition questions that depend on the specific jurisdictions involved.

This is a genuinely complex area, and a lawyer experienced in multi-jurisdiction distress situations can advise on how a UAE process interacts with proceedings or assets elsewhere.

Distressed M&A and Asset Sales

Selling a distressed business as a going concern, either alongside or instead of formal liquidation, is often considered when there is value in preserving operations, employment or key relationships.

A lawyer can advise on how a distressed sale interacts with the applicable insolvency procedure and creditor interests.

Choosing Between a Law Firm and an Independent Lawyer

Larger firms may bring more resources for complex, multi-jurisdiction restructurings involving several regimes at once.

Independent lawyers with genuine, current insolvency experience can offer more direct, accessible support for a single-entity matter. This is a preference you can share through Legal Connect.

LEXNOVA is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Legal Connect exists to help you describe a restructuring or insolvency matter clearly, then explore potentially suitable lawyers from our network.

We consider which regime applies, whether you are a debtor or a creditor, and the urgency of the situation, with every potential match reviewed by a person before an introduction.

Fees vary based on the complexity of the company’s structure, the number of creditors involved, and whether the matter is contested.

LEXNOVA does not set or control fees, this is communicated directly by each professional, and it is reasonable to request a clear estimate before engaging anyone.

START YOUR REQUEST

Tell Us About Your Matter.

The matter type is already set to Restructuring & Insolvency, so the form begins with your location. LEXNOVA is a lawyer-matching service, not a law firm — any legal advice comes directly from the independent legal professional you are connected with.

Step 2 of 540%

Where is your matter located?

HOW LEXNOVA LEGAL CONNECT WORKS

Tell us what you need, we review your requirements against practice area, location, and language, and — where appropriate — help facilitate an introduction to a potentially suitable legal professional. The legal advice itself is always provided directly by that professional.

See the full process

FAQ

Overview & Eligibility

Restructuring generally aims to reorganise a distressed company’s debts or operations so it can continue trading, while insolvency proceedings, including liquidation, typically address a company that cannot continue and needs an orderly wind-down.

Probably not. This category covers financial distress: restructuring debts, preventive composition, bankruptcy and liquidation under Federal Decree-Law No. 51 of 2023 and the separate DIFC and ADGM regimes. A solvent reorganisation, such as a new holding structure, intra-group transfers, a merger, converting a company's legal form or moving its registration between emirates or free zones, is corporate work for Corporate & Commercial and Mergers & Acquisitions lawyers, both linked from this page. Since 15 October 2025, amendments to the Commercial Companies Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 20 of 2025) let a company convert its legal form while keeping its legal personality and transfer its registration between licensing authorities, a point the Mergers & Acquisitions page covers in its FAQ on moving between free zones or emirates without liquidating first. If the reorganisation is driven by debts the company cannot meet, this is the right category.

A dedicated Bankruptcy Court, provided for at Article 5 of Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 and constituted by a Federal Judiciary Council decision in July 2025, seated at the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance. That is a federal court, not the Abu Dhabi emirate-level court of similar name, and it is commonly and incorrectly assumed to be a Dubai institution.

Yes, it is a federal law, so an onshore Dubai company falls under the same framework, with the dedicated Bankruptcy Court seated at the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance regardless of where the company is based. The Federal Judiciary Council may establish branches in other emirates with the same jurisdiction, so the seat is worth confirming at the time of filing.

It restated and updated the onshore UAE bankruptcy framework, in force 1 May 2024, and provided at Article 5 for a dedicated Bankruptcy Court, which was then constituted by a Federal Judiciary Council decision in July 2025. Article 3(2) carves out free zone entities with their own insolvency regimes. A lawyer can advise on how its current provisions apply to your specific situation.

No, onshore UAE law does not recognise a scheme of arrangement in the way some other jurisdictions do. This is a genuine limitation worth understanding before assuming a particular restructuring tool will be available.

No, onshore UAE law does not recognise a floating charge. Security is generally taken over specific, identified assets instead, a lawyer can advise on what security structures are actually available for your situation.

It is a restructuring tool available under ADGM’s insolvency regime, allowing a company to reach a binding arrangement with creditors. It is not available onshore or in the DIFC, only within ADGM.

Cross-class cram-down allows a restructuring to bind a dissenting class of creditors in certain circumstances. Within the UAE, this mechanism exists under ADGM’s regime; it is not a feature of the onshore or DIFC frameworks.

No, the DIFC runs its own separate insolvency regime, distinct from both onshore UAE law and ADGM’s framework. A lawyer can clarify what a DIFC-registered entity can and cannot do under DIFC insolvency law specifically.

Generally, ADGM’s insolvency regime is available to entities registered within ADGM, not to mainland companies. A lawyer can review your specific corporate structure to confirm what is actually accessible.

Onshore UAE law provides for preventive composition and restructuring procedures short of full liquidation, aimed at giving a distressed but viable company a path to reorganise. A lawyer can advise which procedure fits your specific position.

Liquidation generally involves realising the company’s assets and distributing proceeds to creditors in accordance with their priority, under court or appointed-liquidator oversight, before the company is formally dissolved.

Secured creditors generally rank ahead of unsecured creditors in relation to the specific assets covered by their security, though the precise order and treatment depends on the regime and the facts, a lawyer can advise on your specific position.

Yes, creditors can generally petition to initiate proceedings against a debtor company under the onshore framework, a lawyer can advise both debtors and creditors on the realistic implications.

Onshore restructuring procedures generally provide some protection from individual creditor enforcement while the process is active, though the exact scope depends on which procedure is used, a lawyer can confirm what applies to your case.

Yes, director duties can carry personal exposure in a distress scenario, particularly around continuing to trade or incur credit once insolvency is apparent. This is worth reviewing with a lawyer before major decisions are made.

In some circumstances, yes, personal exposure can arise depending on the conduct involved and the specific facts. A lawyer can assess your position honestly rather than assume the worst or the best case.

Secured creditors generally retain rights in relation to their specific security, though how and when those rights can be exercised depends on the regime and the stage of proceedings, a lawyer can advise on enforcement options.

This depends on the specific jurisdictions involved and the regime the UAE entity sits within, mainland, DIFC or ADGM. Cross-border recognition is a genuinely complex area worth addressing early with a lawyer experienced in multi-jurisdiction distress.

Yes, a distressed asset sale or going-concern sale is often considered alongside or instead of liquidation, a lawyer can advise on how this interacts with the applicable insolvency procedure.

Each entity generally falls under the insolvency regime of the jurisdiction where it is registered, so a group spanning all three may need to coordinate strategy across separate, independently operating regimes. A lawyer can help align that approach.

This varies by free zone, and most fall under the onshore federal bankruptcy framework rather than running a separate regime of their own. A lawyer can confirm the position for your specific free zone entity.

Cost generally depends on the complexity of the company’s structure and debts, whether the matter is contested, and the seniority of the lawyer engaged. LEXNOVA does not set or control fees — ask any introduced lawyer for a written estimate before engaging them.

Financial distress generally narrows in options the longer it goes unaddressed, and some protections may depend on acting before certain thresholds are crossed. Marking your request as urgent helps us prioritise accordingly.

How LEXNOVA Works

We consider which regime applies, mainland, DIFC or ADGM, whether you are a debtor or a creditor, and the urgency of your situation, with every potential match reviewed by a person before an introduction.

No, a general description of the company’s situation is enough at this stage. Detailed financial records are best shared directly with the lawyer once you are introduced.

No, LEXNOVA does not guarantee outcomes, and no responsible lawyer would either. Outcomes depend on the company’s specific facts, the regime involved and the strategy pursued.

LEXNOVA is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice, legal opinions, legal representation, or legal services. Any legal advice or representation is provided directly by the independent legal professional engaged by the client.

A connection or introduction does not constitute a guarantee, endorsement, or assurance of outcome. Users should independently confirm the professional's qualifications, authorization, fees, scope of engagement, and suitability.