Find a Restructuring & Insolvency Lawyer
Restructuring and insolvency in the UAE operates across several separate regimes rather than one unified bankruptcy system. Onshore, Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 provided for a dedicated Bankruptcy Court, which a Federal Judiciary Council decision in July 2025 seated at the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance — a federal court, not the Abu Dhabi emirate-level court of similar name, and a detail commonly misreported as a Dubai institution. The DIFC and ADGM each run their own separate insolvency frameworks, and the tools available differ substantially between them: ADGM alone offers a Deed of Company Arrangement with cross-class cram-down, while onshore UAE law does not recognise a scheme of arrangement or a floating charge in the way some other jurisdictions do. Getting the regime and the available tools right, before choosing a strategy, materially changes what a distressed business or its creditors can achieve. LEXNOVA is not a law firm. We help you describe a restructuring or insolvency matter and explore potentially suitable lawyers with genuine, current experience in the relevant UAE regime.
LAST REVIEWED 21 SEPTEMBER 2026
Example Restructuring & Insolvency Matters
- Advising a distressed company on onshore preventive composition or restructuring options
- Filing or defending a bankruptcy petition before the Abu Dhabi-seated federal Bankruptcy Court
- Structuring an ADGM Deed of Company Arrangement, including cross-class cram-down
- Navigating a DIFC insolvency filing for a DIFC-registered entity
- Advising secured and unsecured creditors on recovery options during a distressed situation
- Handling director duties and personal exposure questions in a company facing insolvency
WHO MAY NEED THIS
Distressed businesses and their directors, secured and unsecured creditors, and any mainland UAE, DIFC or ADGM entity considering restructuring options, bankruptcy protection, liquidation, or a distressed asset sale.
Understanding Restructuring and Insolvency in the UAE
Restructuring and insolvency work addresses what happens when a company cannot meet its obligations as they fall due, ranging from a negotiated reorganisation to a formal liquidation.
The UAE does not operate a single bankruptcy system. Onshore UAE, the DIFC and ADGM each run their own regime, with different courts, different procedures and, in places, genuinely different tools.
Why the UAE Runs More Than One Insolvency Regime
The DIFC and ADGM are financial free zones with their own courts and their own insolvency laws, operating independently of the onshore federal framework that applies elsewhere in the UAE.
This means the regime that applies to a distressed company depends on where it is registered, not simply on where it does business or where its assets happen to sit.
The Abu Dhabi-Seated Bankruptcy Court: Correcting Two Common Misconceptions
Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 provided at Article 5 for one or more courts or divisions to be designated as the Bankruptcy Court for onshore UAE bankruptcy matters. The law did not itself constitute that court; a Federal Judiciary Council decision issued in July 2025 did, seating it at the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance.
Two things are frequently got wrong. The first is that it is assumed to be a Dubai institution. The second is subtler and matters just as much: the Abu Dhabi Federal Courts of First Instance are part of the federal judiciary, not the Abu Dhabi emirate-level judiciary that shares a similar name. The Federal Judiciary Council may also establish branches in other emirates with the same jurisdiction, so for any onshore filing or defence the current seat is worth confirming rather than assumed from an older source.
Federal Decree-Law 51 of 2023 and the Onshore Framework
This law restated and updated the onshore UAE bankruptcy framework, in force 1 May 2024, covering preventive composition, restructuring and liquidation procedures for onshore companies. Article 3(2) carves out free zone entities that have their own insolvency regimes, which is why DIFC and ADGM companies fall outside it.
A lawyer with current experience of this framework can advise on which procedure realistically fits a company’s specific financial position.
What Onshore UAE Law Does Not Recognise
Onshore UAE law does not recognise a scheme of arrangement in the way some other jurisdictions do, and it does not recognise a floating charge.
This has real practical consequences: security generally needs to be taken over specific, identified assets, and certain restructuring techniques familiar from other systems simply are not available onshore. A lawyer can advise on what actually is available instead.
ADGM’s Deed of Company Arrangement and Cross-Class Cram-Down
ADGM alone, among the UAE’s insolvency regimes, offers a Deed of Company Arrangement, a tool that lets a company reach a binding arrangement with its creditors.
ADGM’s regime also provides for cross-class cram-down, allowing a restructuring to bind a dissenting class of creditors in appropriate circumstances. Neither tool is available onshore or under the DIFC’s regime.
DIFC’s Separate Insolvency Regime
The DIFC runs its own insolvency framework, distinct from both the onshore federal law and ADGM’s regime, applicable to entities registered within the DIFC.
A DIFC entity in distress needs advice grounded specifically in DIFC insolvency law, not an assumption that onshore or ADGM rules carry across.
Choosing the Right Regime for a Multi-Jurisdiction Group
A group with entities spanning mainland UAE, the DIFC and ADGM can find itself navigating three independently operating insolvency regimes at once, each with its own court and its own tools.
Coordinating strategy across all three, rather than assuming one regime’s approach applies group-wide, is often the difference between an orderly restructuring and a fragmented one.
Restructuring Options for a Distressed Onshore Company
Onshore UAE law provides preventive composition and restructuring procedures intended to give a distressed but fundamentally viable company a path to reorganise short of liquidation.
Which option fits depends heavily on the company’s specific financial position and the willingness of its creditors, a lawyer can advise on the realistic path forward.
Liquidation: How the Process Generally Works
Liquidation generally involves realising a company’s assets and distributing the proceeds to creditors according to their priority, under court or appointed-liquidator oversight, before the company is dissolved.
The specific process and timeline depend on the regime involved, onshore, DIFC or ADGM, and on whether the liquidation is voluntary or ordered by the court.
Secured vs Unsecured Creditors
Secured creditors generally have rights specifically tied to the assets covered by their security, while unsecured creditors rank behind them for those particular assets.
Given that onshore UAE law does not recognise a floating charge, how security was actually taken matters a great deal to how a creditor’s position plays out in a distress scenario.
Director Duties and Personal Exposure in Financial Distress
Directors of a company approaching insolvency can face personal exposure depending on their conduct, particularly around continuing to trade or take on credit once financial difficulty is apparent.
Directors facing this situation benefit from independent legal advice on their own position, separate from advice given to the company itself.
Cross-Border Recognition and Foreign Creditors
A UAE entity with foreign creditors or assets abroad, or a foreign entity with UAE assets, raises cross-border recognition questions that depend on the specific jurisdictions involved.
This is a genuinely complex area, and a lawyer experienced in multi-jurisdiction distress situations can advise on how a UAE process interacts with proceedings or assets elsewhere.
Distressed M&A and Asset Sales
Selling a distressed business as a going concern, either alongside or instead of formal liquidation, is often considered when there is value in preserving operations, employment or key relationships.
A lawyer can advise on how a distressed sale interacts with the applicable insolvency procedure and creditor interests.
Choosing Between a Law Firm and an Independent Lawyer
Larger firms may bring more resources for complex, multi-jurisdiction restructurings involving several regimes at once.
Independent lawyers with genuine, current insolvency experience can offer more direct, accessible support for a single-entity matter. This is a preference you can share through Legal Connect.
How LEXNOVA Legal Connect Helps You Find the Right Lawyer
LEXNOVA is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Legal Connect exists to help you describe a restructuring or insolvency matter clearly, then explore potentially suitable lawyers from our network.
We consider which regime applies, whether you are a debtor or a creditor, and the urgency of the situation, with every potential match reviewed by a person before an introduction.
Understanding Legal Fees for Restructuring & Insolvency Matters
Fees vary based on the complexity of the company’s structure, the number of creditors involved, and whether the matter is contested.
LEXNOVA does not set or control fees, this is communicated directly by each professional, and it is reasonable to request a clear estimate before engaging anyone.
START YOUR REQUEST
Tell Us About Your Matter.
The matter type is already set to Restructuring & Insolvency, so the form begins with your location. LEXNOVA is a lawyer-matching service, not a law firm — any legal advice comes directly from the independent legal professional you are connected with.
HOW LEXNOVA LEGAL CONNECT WORKS
Tell us what you need, we review your requirements against practice area, location, and language, and — where appropriate — help facilitate an introduction to a potentially suitable legal professional. The legal advice itself is always provided directly by that professional.
See the full processFAQ
Overview & Eligibility
How LEXNOVA Works
LEXNOVA is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice, legal opinions, legal representation, or legal services. Any legal advice or representation is provided directly by the independent legal professional engaged by the client.
A connection or introduction does not constitute a guarantee, endorsement, or assurance of outcome. Users should independently confirm the professional's qualifications, authorization, fees, scope of engagement, and suitability.